Review: Baby, Let’s Play House

Not the excellent Sun single – as re-released by RCA:

But the recent and controversial Alanna Nash book:

Nash has written two previous Elvis books – Revelations from the Memphis Mafia and what I am pretty sure is the only biography of Col. Tom Parker – Elvis’ synonymously famous manager.

She has also written many articles about and around Elvis for various magazines. So, she is what’s known as a Subject Matter Expert.

I have read her earlier books and hope to get around to reviewing them, because I do want to compare them to this new book.

My sense of her has been that she is a fair and balanced researcher/writer. But somehow that seems thrown out the window for this one.

Before I get to what I didn’t care for, here’s why I think that Elvis fans should read this book:

1. Extremely rare photos, more likely never seen outside the photo albums of the various women Elvis met and, well, dated as much as he was able to.

2. Far more girlfriends than have ever been previously talked about in books – and by the women themselves, not Elvis’ Memphis Mafia guys who I think after reading this, never saw the side of Elvis that women did.

3. While it quotes Horace Logan from the Louisiana Hayride as claiming to  know an unidentified  woman that he discouraged from telling Elvis that she was pregnant, overall,  I think that the book should put an end to all the secret love children stories. Elvis had it drilled into him early that a illegitimate child or early marriage would end his career by Parker. And his mother drilled into him a love of family, so that he wouldn’t have ignored any child he knew to be his.

4. The stories shared by the women give a sense of Elvis’ more vulnerable and emotional side. More telling that the stories, is how many women remain fiercely loyal and decline to share very detailed information. And how many still consider him the love of their lives. June Juanico’s retelling of Elvis’ death and her still beleving into the 70’s that she and Elvis would reunite was a little bit heartbreaking.

June had detailed her relationship with Elvis in her own really good DVD and book:

June was a serious contender for marriage with Elvis – but, on the cusp of his unprecedented fame, it became more an issue of timing than caring. But, that’s for another review.

What I didn’t like – but, not enough to regret having read and own the newest Nash book:

1.  The psychological approach. This feels a bit contrived and an appeal to an authority who really has no basis for it. Without ever having met or treated a person, I think it’s more than pretentious to assume you can really know what motivates them to the level the doctor quoted here does.

2.  Byron Raphael. In 2005, Nash co-wrote an article for Playboy in which this previously unknown in Elvis world man made many claims about his relationship with Elvis. The short version was that Byron was  low level employee for William Morris who transferred to Parker’s office. Raphael claims to have procured girls for Elvis (well boring, what guys around him didn’t?)  but more than that he makes a very unbelievable claim about Natalie Wood.

Nash unfortunately seemed to have believed him enough for that article but also to include his various claims in the new book.

The story he claims is such an outlier to all the other stories, that it boggles me that Nash would beleive that Wood stormed out of Elvis’ bedroom, frustrated by his unwillingness for full intercourse that she demanded Raphael service her right in the livingroom in front of Elvis’ posse.

Let’s pretend it’s true for a moment. Elvis had an ego and a real temper about the guys around him flirting with girls he’s dating.

Is he really going to continue allowing Raphael to hang out with him? Is he really going to continue hanging out with Natalie for another month? Why would she hang out with Elvis? She was a big star all on her own and didn’t need publicity dates.

3. Albert Goldman. Nash quotes him and engages in some of his theatrics of story telling. This parts are a bit jarring when she goes into lurid detail of 70’s Elvis bodily problems as a result of drug use. It throws you out of the story, adds nothing but puerile content in an otherwise unique and largely unexplored angle on the Elvis mythos.

4. No Priscilla. She was the only one he married, the only one who had his child. Her absence in the book is a major setback. The use of quotes from interviews and inclusions from Priscilla’s earlier book, Elvis and Me doesn’t allow for the same rumination and perspective.

Further, the “help” by Alanna’s researcher, the writer of the anti-Priscilla book, Child Bride adds more to the Goldman tone and in my view, diminishes the book with this pointless venom.

Fans will love or hate the book – the Sheila Ryan story is a particular sore spot, as it’s the only one to get into detail about sex with Elvis. I found the story to be rather mild and don’t understand why the backlash and fuss over the detail. I thought it worked in the larger context of the book.

Non-Fans would do better with a more general work – and I strongly and seriously recommend:

Public Service and Taxpayers

With the Harper government’s new budget, comes their renewed attack on the Federal Public Service.

But the voters and public at large shouldn’t fall for this scapegoating.

The salary of the public service employees does largely come from taxes – personal taxes, corporate taxes, sales and other taxes  – but also the service fees, fines, proceeds of crime sales and other revenue that departments generate.

Departments that collect money don’t keep it for themselves – it goes to the Receiver General and is disbursed according to the budget.

The salary of a Public Service employee, whether they are federal, provincial or municipal, is not a gift from you to us.

We work for our salary the same as anyone else. We pay taxes and are consumers, same as you. And, we pay into benefit and pension plans – like some other people do.

That most Canadians do not have an employer pension plan doesn’t mean that the Public Service Pension Plan is up for grabs.

I find it very curious this attitude that Public Service Employees somehow owe something extra or that “taxpayers” are somehow our bosses because our salaried are linked entirely to taxes in the public mind.

Well, here’s a thought:

Public Service employees go to restaurants, buy consumer goods, hire professionals,  we spend money the same as everyone else.

Everyone’s salary is taken from everyone’s pockets who participates in the economy.

That Public Service salaries are partly tax sourced isn’t any different from a retail employee or office worker’s salary being sourced from their company’s profits.

After all, everyone does enjoy having infrastructure like safe highways, rail and air. Regulated drugs and first responders to disease outbreaks, disasters. Investment into and regulation of industries – even international promotion and a lot of services that are simply not appropriate for the private sector – like immigration and citizenship, welfare and unemployment insurance programs, Veteran Affairs,  international trade, crown land, treaties and oversight of a lot of legislation.

Government services exist because they are not provided by the private sector – which has proved time and time again to not be trustworthy to regulate itself.

In Canada, we are lucky to not have the rampant corruption that other countries have. That is because of the checks and balances – but also that people are compensated fairly for their work.

People are needed to provide those services, which means we get paid like anyone else in any sector.

Not happy with your salary or benefits – then why not try out the public sector?

Or maybe you would work instead to build up the benefits of your industry, instead of knocking down another sector.

Roll back wages, stealing the pension that we pay into, and the demoralizing scapegoating, is not the way to improve the services you get or encourage anyone with skills and a passion for service to join the public service.

I am not saying that all public service employees are excellent and every workplace has  slackers and incompetents, no matter what the sector is.

But when an industry is tarred as having a particular kind of employee – guess who ends up being the dominate applicants and eventually employee? The negative stereotype.

Reality is that you  get the service what you pay for,  no matter what sector it is.