Obviously not the Anglo-Saxon C word; but Christmas.
(Okay, maybe not soooo obvious)
I am done with being attacked for attacking Christmas.
Christmas is not under attack by atheists or believers in other religions.
Christmas is under attack by moderate and apologist Christians – this is the latest incarnation of the White Guilt of the 60s/70s over slavery that occurred before the Mea Culpas were born.
Christians who are trying to prove that they are inclusive by shoving their own identity aside and feeling guilty for being descended from White European Christian stock who arrived in the New World and decimated the populations already living there, made it hard for non-white immigrants to come to these shores once the bureaucracy was in place and people couldn’t just sail over and homestead.
Or perhaps it’s just a bit more sinister – as long as Christians try to eliminate use of the C-word and then defend it vigorously; then maybe, just maybe all the non-Christians will get fed up and say, keep using your stupid C-word just include the other holiday names.
So that no one notices that all the statutory holidays that aren’t civic are Christian.
It’s not the use of this or that name that demonstrates inclusiveness, but rather according equal status.
So, unless Canada and the US are going to either only have civic statutory holidays or add other stat holidays from other religions and cultures; it doesn’t matter what names we use or don’t.
Because the appearance of inclusion under any other name is still just the appearance of, and not actual inclusive multiculturalism.