morally replacing dieties

when the claim of a deity is false on the face of it, the details and particulars are not relevant to the rejection – what is claimed without proof, can be dismissed without consideration

religion as a system of morality is insufficient to provide a framework for it’s adherents, since they put far more emphasis on repentance than refraining from immorality in the first place –

atheism is not a replacement of religion, is is a rejection; and this being the case is not a framework for morality, that is something that each person must work out on their own,

but religious people who have accepted the religious premise that knowing the difference and being able to work out morality on their own is the ultimate sin because when you understand the difference between good and evil, you have no further use of any god.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s