I am a science buff and a fiction writer. I studied anthropology and many of the soft sciences at college and my father has a Masters Degree in Behavioral Psychology.
So, growing up, I learned about behavioral studies and was encouraged to experiment and explore the world around me. I was encouraged to be curious about the world, to learn and to express myself. I grew up in the 1970’s in the lower mainland of British Columbia and I went to an elementary and high school in the Canadian public education system, where I did a broad range of subjects and I continued my studies at college, university and I continue to read a variety of science publications ranging from archeology to psychology.
My work history has allowed me to observe people in a range of settings and most significantly, I have been a Federal Government employee, who’s work has been largely to collect, analyze and collate massive amounts of data.
I am also a writer of several formats and a graphic artist – so I am a lab coat and a art smock at the same time. Additionally, as a lesbian and atheist – I am not really bound by traditional thinking or social conventions.
With that introduction – here’s my drawings and thoughts about the impact of birth order, inter-generational relationships on sexuality.
Where it begins:
This drawing is an over view – at the top corner we have the biological parents represented with the 4 potential off-spring types – pink and blue circles represent heterosexual gender offspring and the purple circles are for queer/transgendered offspring with birth gender represented by the chromosomes.
The nurture factors are represented by colour lines.
The orange box represents childhood – the 3 colour line the sexuality/gender of the child, with gold representing the optimal ideal conditions being non abuse, house/food/financial security, a supportive environment where learning is encouraged and quality values taught – basically how educational, artistic, social responsibility, compassion/tolerance and other ethics are taught without children being limited to oppressive gender role traditions and being able to balance protectiveness vs allowing age appropriate decisions to be made by the child.
The purple box repeats this concepts as experienced in the teenage phase of development. Again, non-abuse, socialization with peers, age appropriate separation and individualized from parents and positive reinforcement of risk assessment, value judgements and sexuality development and access to education, arts, athletics and other social and intellectual development factors.
Females have an XX and males have an XY – and the Y is basically an X with one quarter of the sequence missing – this is why the drawing indicates females as 100% genetically complete and males at 87.% – this is just basic math – and in my view, why women are more adaptive multi-taskers and more sexually fluid over their lifetimes while males are more linear task oriented thinkers and hard wired in their sexuality.
In this image, I formula human life – all potential life begins with the egg – and the potential life is realized with the fertilization from a sperm delivering the other half of the genetics – either an X or a Y.
Now, as an aside, while a fertilized egg is the start of the potential human life, this is not a compelling moral or legal argument for the rights, bodily integrity or decision/self determination of the women to suddenly be suspended in favor of a mass of cells smaller than the period at the end of this sentence, and especially not in favor of the religious or personal views of anyone who is not the woman in question. I specify potential human life because there are many reasons why a fertilized egg may not result in a viable offspring.
This drawing represents the born and viable offspring – the majority will be heterosexual male or females with some minority percentage being lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual and other rarer non-heterosexual in terms of sexuality as well as transgendered, gender outlaws and gender non-conformists – including hermaphrodites.
So our genetics give us our nature and what happens in childhood – does not remain in childhood, but is the nurturing basis that forms our personalities through our lives – how we deal with adversity, manage interpersonal relationships to our interests, hobbies and everything about us as individuals being socially capable and functional.
I have always thought that our nature gives us our potential and our nurture provides our limitations – which we can then either fall within or strive to exceed – again depending on personality, experiences through life and social opportunities.
The black box in the drawing is a reminder that there are in a normal population where gender selection abortion or female infanticide does not occur, that there are 104 male infants born for every 100 female infants – and that in a normal population in a secular democratic nation with modern medicine access, 6 male infants will not reach their first birthday – this is naturally and not including infant deaths owing to neglect, abuse or intentional abandonment following birth. In a normal population, females comprise 51% of the population. Which means that women are the majority….
so then extrapolating that to population demographics and likely to rare outcomes:
true – says this ATHEIST:
organized religion depends on having a sacred text, a structured hierarchy of top down authority and followers who do not directly access or interpret the texts. additionally, organized RELIGION is all about NUMBERS of followers be it in mega churches or as televangelists in a one way communication direction – top to bottom.
spirituality is individual or in small groups, a mentor/student structure and often there are no writings to be misinterpreted or applied.
spirituality is more harmonious with nature and all about actually being the best you can be
instead of applying a list of rules and obeying them as if that is any measure of right and wrong.