People who make a difference

Normal I blot out names of people I don’t know well

but these two seem to take pride in their views, so let their names stand by their words

Romney Christian Controversy

CNN reports that Mitt Romney is under attack by fellow Republicans for not being the right kind of Christian – Romney is Mormon – AND because of his Christian behavior towards illegal immigrants:

“Medical help for illegal immigrants could haunt Mitt Romney” reads the headline Monday’s edition of the newspaper. The story details a program in the 2006 Massachusetts health care plan (which then Gov. Romney signed into law) called Health Safety Net, which allows undocumented illegal immigrants to obtain needed medical care along with other people in the state who lack insurance.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the program cost more than $400 million last year and paid for 1.1 million hospital and clinic visits, but it’s not certain how many illegal immigrants received treatment since Massachusetts does not record such data.

Republican Party hopefuls and the right wing Evangelical base has always cast doubt and mistrust on Romney because he’s a mainstream Mormon, a religion not deemed Christian enough to be in the Christian umbrella – which includes all other Jesus based sects, excepting the Catholic Church – while Catholics assert that they are the only true church of Christ, having outlasted all the earlier sect competitors and having had a long run during the Dark Ages as the only sect.

Well, only public sect, go you John the Baptist Christians who don’t recognize Jesus.

All of which means that the religious right is no longer concerned with being a big tent and are entirely concerned with transitioning from being the Christian branch of the Taliban and bringing America down and forcing it to exist under a Christian theocracy.

Of course, they like to pretend that America was founded on Christian – and sometimes grudgingly Judea-Christian values, but mostly Christian ones – despite that none of of the significant Founding Fathers were Christian and were rather vocally against Christianity; generally seeing it as one of the more harmful religions.

Clearly, a significant concern, given how much the Religious Right has infiltrated and corrupted American government with it’s slowly inching into the pledge of allegiance and on money, which it was never originally included in.

But it’s hysterically funny to me that Mitt Romney is viewed as Christians for being the wrong kind of Christian because of being a mainstream Mormon who keeps his beliefs mostly to himself – unlike other Republican Hopeful Rick Santorium (Santorum 1. The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. 2. Senator Rick Santorum.), who brought home his still born baby so that his living children could know their sibling and, well, to photograph…..

Talk about an overshare – and why is this not cause for administrative leave from work and serious therapy for this fetishistizing of life at any cost?

But what’s really interesting is how Christians, raised on stories of Samaritans, Sodom and Gomorrah’s destruction for poor host behaviours – although, when the bar for being a good host is offering your daughters for rape by a mob…..

That Romney is being criticized for ensuring universal health care in his State because that coverage ended up including essential health care for illegal immigrants is very telling about what Christianity means – everything for those who are in the club and death for everyone outside of the club.

Romney won’t ever be Christian enough for evangelicals, even when he acts in a manner that most people beleive Christianity requires. Worse, Romney himself passes the buck for the medical care provided to the Democratic Governor who followed him. Imagine being ashamed of providing help to those in need.

Perhaps that’s the real problem – what Christianity claims to be the desired and admirable but humble behaviour, is not at all real Christian behaviour. Is in fact an affront to Christians because it’s inclusive of people that they are seeking to exclude.

The New Colossus

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Emma Lazarus, 1883

Which makes me wonder, how America has sunk so far to become an unofficial Christian theocratic shut in, isolationistly and xenophobically paranoid about the huddle masses yearning to breath free that they once invited to their shores.

If any sanity remain in American voters, Romney is one of the better republican candidates – because he he balances his private beliefs with his public responsibilities as an elected official – Romney has appeal outside of the Evangelical Christians – who can’t understand that if elected, you represent all the people – not just the ones who are like you or who voted for you or just those who underwrote your campaign.

That evangelicals are ignoring that secular law is the law of the land and that elected officials have to work within secular law and represent all citizens is a serious concern.

Evangelicals appear more concerned with their afterlife experience than the life experience now and into the future.

That so many Americans are convinced that it’s the end of days means that they are not interested in concerns of continued living on the planet – and we cannot run a country on the assumption that everything is ending, so get what you can while you still can.

We need to elect people who are planning for future generations to continue existing on earth and not elect people who are convinced that there’s a divine plan and it’s underway to get rid of the inconvenient people and restore the planet to garden of eden factory settings.

We need to elect people who care about the quality of life people are living now and into the future, not hoarding resources away from the people who produce the wealth.

We the people have to take back the nation and the world.

The time for huddled masses yearning is over, the masses are stepping up – Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street to the ballot boxes.

We need to choose life and not give into the fears perpetuated by doomsday cults, of which, Christianity is the biggest.

The religious martyr east-west divide

If you aren’t prepared to die for what you believe in, you don’t deserve to live

In the mid 1980’s on a school field trip from Chilliwack, a rural community, to Vancouver, the comparative Big City, I saw those words were hand lettered in white on the back of a denim jacket worn by a punk rocker.

Most of the other teens – the school was primarily cliques of head bangers and goody two show kids – on the field trip, made ooo and ahhh cat calls in complete non-comprehension and likely more to do with the fact of the young man being a punk rocker than the sentiment on his back.  I sat frozen, looking at the words and absorbing them very deeply. When you’re a teenager, everything feels epic, life and death, but you don’t really have a sense of what those concepts really mean. Or what if anything, you believe in, never mind what would be worth dying for. Dying was for old people; except….. my favorite movie at that time, was TAPS, starring Tim Hutton and pre-Ridgemont High Sean Penn and introducing Tom Cruise as three military students who lead a student revolt against the closure of their school – to disastrous and predictable conclusion of romanticizing the death of youths for a cause greater than oneself.

This idea of martyrdom continues to hold sway, people who die for religion are made into saints, religions demand sacrifice of supporters and promise eternal afterlife rewards for those who die in service or at least, when taking out the enemies of religion.

In American, religious zealots are less willing to die themselves but are often fairly open to taking out those who they see as betrayers or enemies – shooting abortion doctors right inside their own community church if need be. The American zealots tend to prefer to live to kill more another day, but when they do end up dying, it’s more likely suicide by cop during a shooting event than taking their own life. Suicide being a sin for which you burn in hell, and apparently this is not balanced against the good of protecting the unborn by the murder of a medical doctor.

As if forcing a police officer into killing you is somehow different than doing it yourself….. might as well take up extreme sports as the avoid hell loophole to suicide and not traumatize another person.

Whereas, Islamic zealots are more the hands on martyrs, strapping on a bomb belt and detonating in the crowd – even though sometimes, they only manage to take out themselves – we have to give them kudos for being fully committed in a way that makes North American Zealots look like they are phoning it in.

Not that there’s anything remotely admirable about being a martyr or, for that matter a criminal. The admiration in American culture for the gunslingers, mobsters, gangsters, outlaw bikers and gangstas is on the same wavelength as admiration for saints and martyrs. They are all the same spectrum of rule breaking outsider who’s become romanticized in pulp fiction, movies and video games.

They are an archetype that fulfills the fantasy of rule breaking freedom, being the law unto yourself, to be the power or to be the one fighting the power. The reality is far short of the fantasy.

Criminals are no different than businessmen, they are in it for the prestige and the cash, the power and influence, one through force and the other through cunning. Their respective criminality and anti-social behavior is only limited by the scope of their reach – and businessmen have a far greater reach than criminals – organized or otherwise – as businessmen who put stockholders above employees, customers, financial institutions and the environment do far more damage to society than the most violent of criminals can hope to.

Criminals, be they in legitimate or underground business, are related to the zealot martyrs, in that they often feel entitled by a higher call or by some quirk of birth or force of personality, to be above or beyond the rules that apply to mortal and lesser men. To be rule makers unto themselves.

Hmmm, putting it that way – the dictator/politicians, criminal/business, outlaws and zealots are really the same spectrum of anti-social disorders. Especially with the recent revelation that many if not most American Republicans believe that they are called by god to run for office and that dictators assure their populaces that they are themselves divine – but never in a fun campy way, always the creepy religious way.

To some degree, the mentality of “live fast, die young” explains the willingness of criminals to accept life as brutal and short, to live and die in service of the gang or larger community, is no different than a person who is a religious martyr, who either dies as part of an assault on their religious foes or in self-sacrifice in self-immolation as a form of protest.

Western secular zealots are less self-sacrificing than their eastern counterparts generally, again, preferring to not be caught or to be killed by police or by the state after a media saturated trial. The most horrifying fate for the western murderous zealot would be to be caught and endure life in obscurity and prison; without even a made for TV movie to explain their crusade.

Perhaps if we could understand the nuance between a zealot willing to self-sacrifice and one who is only willing to sacrifice others, we could identify the thought process that allows a person to sacrifice life in the name of ideology.

The willingness to die for causes has traditionally been thought linked to the degree of economic participation and freedoms one had in their respective society.

For bigoted reasons, the 9/11 hijackers changed this idea – suicide bombers where thought of as disaffected, disengaged young men – but the 9/11 hijackers were middle aged, married and many with children and professional career credentials. Most of them were engineers by training and trade. The increase in female suicide bombers also flies in the face of convention.

I say for bigoted reasons, because Timothy McVeigh was middle class and employed and he looked and could have been anyone. Homespun terrorists hit too close to home to analyze perhaps, much easier to hand wring and wonder about the truth when we don’t have to examine ourselves too closely.

People are something in between herd and pack animals – we like just enough structure to provide a consistent and stable framework, but we also like our individuality and some freedom from restrictive social roles (gender or socio-economic). Collectively, anyway, some people reveal in anarchy and others rejoice in rigidity. To each their own comfort level, but most of us in the middle spectrum like these two extremes in some balance or variability – it maintains our illusion of not only freedom, but free will.

Aside: Here’s a terrible thought, what if the only true expression of free will is choosing to die?

It all comes down to what do you value, or, as the punk rocker wrote, what you believe in.

Do you believe in yourself or do you only credit you with value when you are in service or attached to something bigger?

I think that if you are not enough to assign value to, you have no option but to glom onto something bigger, be it religion, politics, sub-culture, anti-culture or social movement. But, by casting yourself in a supporting role, you become vulnerable to exploitation by people who have no problem with their own self worth and often will fall prey to people with the opposite problem – those who value themselves as better than everyone else.

Leaders of movements have dupes, pawns, toadies, hangers on, minions and disaffected fanatics to do the sacrificing.

It’s never the leaders of any movement who self-immolate or strap on a bomb belt – when the leaders of a movement die, it’s usually a result of either their own over-indulgence with drugs/alcohol or in a doomsday cult mass murder/suicide when the legal authorities come knocking and blaring music and blazing gunfire.

It doesn’t matter how much education or professional accreditation or career accomplishments or families one has, without self-worth, there can be no value or worth inherent in these accomplishments and connections. Without valuing yourself, you have no value to transfer or put into accomplishments or connections; and instead, seek external validation to convey worth and value to your person.

It seems to me, that in addition to fluoride to compensate for the state of dental hygiene, that the government may wish to add anti-depressants to the water. Except that governments of any kind prefer a compliant and only marginally disaffected population who feels bad enough to console themselves through shopping therapy, but not bad enough to get out and vote or revolt.

We find meaning and purpose when we are connected to other people, to the community and we can economically participate and contribute to the world. But this cannot be our only source of value – we have to value ourselves in order for other people to value our contributions and to value ourselves.

Individuals are the basic part that make up the larger blocks of family, friends, colleagues (packs), demographic groups (herds), and segments of society (hives). We are the parts that form the sum, and must in turn, be enhanced as a part by the resultant sum. It is not enough that we contribute, but our contribution must be honored and recognized uniquely.

By us being a part and merely feeding the machine without recognition and enhancement, without that feedback  balance, it is little wonder then, that maladaptive and anti-social behaviours emerge, and eventually, bites the hand that has stopped feeding them.