makes an interesting point about bisexuals – are they gay enough to qualify as a refugee fleeing from persecution of homosexuals?
Uganda, officially the Republic of Uganda, is a landlocked country in East Africa. Uganda is also known as the “Pearl of Africa”. It is bordered on the east by Kenya, on the north by South Sudan, on the west by the Democratic Republic of the Congo, on the southwest by Rwanda, and on the south by Tanzania. The southern part of the country includes a substantial portion of Lake Victoria, which is also shared by Kenya and Tanzania.
Uganda takes its name from the Buganda kingdom, which encompasses a large portion of the south of the country including the capital Kampala.
The people of Uganda were hunter-gatherers until 1,700 to 2,300 years ago, when Bantu-speaking populations migrated to the southern parts of the country. Uganda gained independence from Britain on 9 October 1962.
The official languages are English and Swahili, although multiple other languages are spoken in the country.
We fear for the lives of our friends and LGBT activists.
Please help us to get
LGBT EQUALITY IN UGANDA
write to your representives in our country
Support our mission, to have LGBT freedom in Uganda.
closed communities or secretive ghettoized cultures
where polygamy is occuring under the legal radar is harmful to any member of the given community who have no ability to make their own decisions, but the decisions are made by elders or parents on your behalf or you as a pawn in their interests – say creating family alliances
yes, most cultures have had polygamy because might made right and the world was designed by warlords – he who has the gold rules
we don’t live like that in secular democratic nations
so it doesn’t matter what the traditions used to be in the old country – this is a new country where the individual is the social unit of consequence,
not family clans or tribes or warlord dynasties
by removing a person’s choice, you are reducing them to chattel, subhuman
and when you view people as subhuman, then, there is nothing that you won’t do to them
lambs are for slaughter
How many decades has Gadhafi been in power that all of a sudden, the world has suddenly noticed that this dictator is not an okay guy to run Libya after all?
Given how Rwanda, Darfur and many other countries lacking oil had their civil upheavals under dictatorships deemed an internal matter that was unseemly for the international community to be involved in; this sudden: Gosh, Gadhafi’s a terrible dictator who needs to be removed! is a bit odd.
I mean, as opposed to all the good dictators who are in the pay of or are supported by the US?
The UN has to have a consistent policy.
Maybe the UN should be replaced with something more like the United Federation of Planets – at least that was human-centric and not a specific country centric. At the very least, UN membership could more closely resemble the UFP – nations can’t join unless there is a determined minimum level of standard of living for the majority of the population.
Standard of living includes education, health care, economic opportunity, rights and freedoms and environmental sustainability. More on this later.
Either an internal civil matter is exactly that – or the world is really one place with the UN as, at least, the world police if not the actual world government.
We cannot set one rule for civil unrest for countries with oil and another for countries without.
Either we say dictators are bad – and then we’d have to say theocracies are bad too – and force the conversion of every non-democratic country into a democratic country – or, we leave internal civil matters, no matter how genocidally horrific – to be managed internally.
The reality is that social advances and massive civil changes do not work when imposed by external forces – unless it’s a multi-generational occupying force.
Social and political change must come from within any nation. The people of the country have to want change – otherwise, as soon as the occupation force is kicked out or leaves – that country will be business as usual with the endless game of what rebel turned dictator is in charge now.
It does not work for a country to be managed on a might makes right basis, internally or externally.
The Collective People must determine what kind of social structure will work for them and failing to achieve it is far worse than never trying. After all, no one stepped in to stop America from rebelling against England.
Where there is an international interest in the internal workings of any nation is on matters that are not contained within the borders. This includes environmental concerns but also refugee migration.
When a portion of a population flees their home nation, it is everyone’s concern. Regardless of whether there’s oil to be had.
Robin Williams once referred to the UN as a traffic cop on Valium.
It’s time for the international community to stop the addiction to oil and other resources that makes the eyes turn away from genocide, environmental destruction, loss of species and habitat and nations with oppressive regimes where the general population’s greatest fear is their own government.
But, this is perhaps too lofty a goal, given how American centric the UN is and that the US population, while touting their government as the best form of government; still cling to their “right” to be armed against said government.